Strict Type Definition: Difference between revisions
Appearance
No edit summary |
Pbrooks100 (talk | contribs) m Added image to clarify how to make a CTL a typdef |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A strict type definition [STD] is like a [[Type Definition|type definition]] with well-defined appearance. | A strict type definition [STD] is like a [[Type Definition|type definition]] with well-defined appearance. | ||
STDs are created by saving as this type of control - similar to 'simple' type definitions. | |||
<center>[[Image:Type_Def_Status.png]]</center> | |||
Well-defined appearance means that all instances of STD's share the appearance of that STD, e.g. their properties cannot be changed (except of label, caption and enable-state). | |||
This is handy whenever the size, color etc. needs to be fixed. Think of sophisticated screen designs or stacked STDs. STDs are created by saving as this type of control - similar to 'simple' type definitions. | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
Revision as of 18:01, 2 January 2008
A strict type definition [STD] is like a type definition with well-defined appearance.

Well-defined appearance means that all instances of STD's share the appearance of that STD, e.g. their properties cannot be changed (except of label, caption and enable-state).
This is handy whenever the size, color etc. needs to be fixed. Think of sophisticated screen designs or stacked STDs. STDs are created by saving as this type of control - similar to 'simple' type definitions.
See Also
External Links
- Creating Type Definitions and Strict Type Definitions[1]